Scfr Ksa

关于我们

Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in many state, federal, and local laws. These laws restrict discrimination based upon certain qualities or "protected categories". The United States Constitution also restricts discrimination by federal and state federal governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the private sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has actually ended up being based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law restricts discrimination in a number of areas, including recruiting, employing, task evaluations, promotion policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend defense to additional categories or employers.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers normally can not victimize employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] nationwide origin, [1] special needs (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for workers over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] genetic information, [10] and citizenship status (for residents, long-term citizens, momentary citizens, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964

Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight resolve work discrimination, employment however its restrictions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to secure federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny individuals of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due procedure of the law. It likewise includes an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from breaking a person's rights of due process and equivalent security. In the employment context, these Constitutional provisions would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with employees, former workers, or task candidates unequally because of membership in a group (such as a race or sex). Due procedure defense needs that government staff members have a fair procedural procedure before they are terminated if the termination is connected to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination costs (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional since Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically give their particular government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the personal sector. The Federal government's authority to control a personal organization, consisting of civil liberties laws, originates from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly afford some defense from public and personal work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only deal with discriminatory treatment by the government, including a public employer.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil liberties laws that control the are generally Constitutional under the "cops powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws developed to secure public health, security and morals. All States should comply with the Federal Civil liberty laws, but States may enact civil rights laws that offer extra work defense.

For example, some State civil liberties laws use defense from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, even though such forms of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing employment discrimination has actually developed gradually.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is implemented by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying various salaries based upon sex. It does not prohibit other prejudiced practices in working with. It supplies that where employees carry out equal work in the corner requiring "equal ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions," they must be supplied equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act uses to employers participated in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the business is engaged as a whole in a substantial quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts discrimination in a lot more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII developed the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It uses to a lot of employers taken part in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor companies, and employment service. Title VII forbids discrimination based on race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it illegal for employers to discriminate based upon safeguarded attributes concerning terms, conditions, and advantages of employment. Employment service might not discriminate when hiring or referring candidates, and labor organizations are likewise prohibited from basing subscription or union categories on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, defining that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based upon pregnancy, giving birth, and related medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, forbids companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The forbidden practices are almost identical to those described in Title VII, except that the ADEA safeguards employees in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. A staff member is protected from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and restricted necessary retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise provide big pensions). The ADEA consists of explicit guidelines for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of many discussion of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "developed a policy against age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts work discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal specialists with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It requires affirmative action in addition to non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs reasonable accommodation, and Section 508 requires that electronic and details technology be available to disabled workers. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 forbids discrimination by mine operators against miners who struggle with "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal specialists". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids work discrimination on the basis of insolvency or bad debts. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than 3 staff members from discriminating versus anybody (other than an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate discriminatory barriers against certified individuals with impairments, individuals with a record of a special needs, or individuals who are concerned as having a special needs. It forbids discrimination based upon real or viewed physical or mental specials needs. It also requires companies to supply reasonable lodgings to workers who require them since of an impairment to get a task, carry out the important functions of a job, or enjoy the advantages and privileges of employment, unless the company can reveal that unnecessary difficulty will result. There are rigorous restrictions on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or need medical checkups, and all medical information must be treated as personal. A disability is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably restricts several major life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, modified in 1993, guarantee all individuals equivalent rights under the law and outline the damages readily available to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing people' hereditary details when making hiring, shooting, job positioning, or promotion choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [upgrade], 28 US states do not explicitly include sexual preference and employment 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Job Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment protections for LGBT individuals were patchwork; a number of states and localities explicitly restrict harassment and predisposition in employment choices on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public staff members. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's identified that transgender employees were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to include sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the office. Moreover, a shocking 90 percent of transgender workers report some form of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Lots of people in the LGBT community have lost their job, consisting of Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who claims that her manager told her that her presence may make other people feel uncomfortable. [26]

Almost half of the United States likewise have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and private offices. A few more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public workplaces. [27] Some challengers of these laws think that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually likewise recognized that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes likewise supply comprehensive security from employment discrimination. Some laws extend comparable defense as provided by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide security to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws supply higher security to employees of the state or of state professionals.

The following table lists classifications not safeguarded by federal law. Age is included as well, considering that federal law just covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, personal appearance [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Civil servant

Title VII also uses to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra protections against work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not affect job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has interpreted this as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be broadened to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public staff members keep their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies have the right to limitations employees' speech in certain ways. [93] Public employees maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, employment and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]

Federal workers who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to sue in the correct federal jurisdiction, which poses a different set of concerns for complainants.

Exceptions

Authentic occupational certifications

Employers are usually permitted to think about attributes that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are authentic occupational credentials (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that police security can match races when required. For circumstances, if cops are running operations that include confidential informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are proportional to the community's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for motion pictures and television. [95] Directors, producers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based on physical attributes, employment such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are unusual in the home entertainment industry, particularly in performers. [95] This justification is distinct to the home entertainment market, and does not transfer to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost justification in wage gaps between different groups of staff members. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company must balance personal privacy and security worry about the number of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]

Additionally, customer preference alone can not be a justification unless there is a privacy or security defense. [96] For employment example, retail establishments in rural locations can not forbid African American clerks based upon the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that handle kids survivors of sexual assault is permitted.

If a company were trying to show that employment discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there should be an accurate basis for believing that all or considerably all members of a class would be unable to perform the task safely and efficiently or that it is not practical to identify certifications on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malevolent intention does not transform a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced result. [97] Employers also carry the problem to reveal that a BFOQ is fairly necessary, and a lesser discriminatory alternative method does not exist. [98]

Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with individuals in a different way in their employment because of their religious beliefs, their religions and practices, and/or their ask for lodging (a modification in a work environment rule or policy) of their religions and practices. It likewise consists of dealing with individuals differently in their work since of their absence of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, employers are forbidden from refusing to work with an individual based upon their religion- alike race, sex, age, and disability. If an employee thinks that they have experienced religious discrimination, they need to address this to the supposed culprit. On the other hand, staff members are protected by the law for reporting task discrimination and are able to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some locations in the U.S. now have clauses that ban discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide particular exemptions in these laws to businesses or organizations that are religious or religiously-affiliated, however, to varying degrees in different locations, depending upon the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been supported and others reversed with time.

The most recent and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the widespread rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are using religions against altering the body and preventative medication as a reason to not receive the vaccination. Companies that do not permit employees to request spiritual exemptions, or reject their application may be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are particular requirements for staff members to present proof that it is a truly held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has actually dealt with criticism for forbiding females from serving in fight roles. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was amended to permit them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the short article posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the method which black guys were treated in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites provided the African Americans a chance to prove themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic website states, however, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were just enabled to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and employment cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to safeguard the country they lived in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the task rights of individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or specific types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise prohibits companies from discriminating against staff members for previous or present participation or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer preference to veterans versus non-veterans has actually been declared to impose systemic disparate treatment of ladies since there is a huge underrepresentation of ladies in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually rejected this claim because there was no prejudiced intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly victimize a protected classification might still be prohibited if they produce a diverse effect on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they belong to task efficiency.

The Act needs the removal of artificial, approximate, and unnecessary barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to omit Negroes can not be shown to be related to job performance, it is forbidden, regardless of the company's lack of discriminatory intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been identified by the EEOC as having a disparate impact on national origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a diverse impact claim that alleges age discrimination, a company, however, does not require to demonstrate requirement; rather, it needs to merely show that its practice is reasonable. [citation required]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are consisted of in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its regulations and guidelines are contained in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file match under Title VII and/or the ADA should exhaust their administrative remedies by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their suit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which forbids discrimination against certified individuals with impairments by federal professionals and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each agency has and enforces its own regulations that use to its own programs and to any entities that receive financial support. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) implements the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination against individuals with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage gap in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit rating systems in the United States

References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans workplace bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the original on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the original on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Tabulation, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the initial on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful inequitable practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New york city Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of employers". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work since of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for employment Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the initial on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Rights Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their employing practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for more US ladies in combat". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Causing the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to secure older employees. Weak to begin with, she states that the ADEA has actually been eviscerated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.