关于我们

Employment Discrimination Law in The United States

Employment discrimination law in the United States derives from the typical law, and is codified in many state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based upon particular characteristics or "secured classifications". The United States Constitution also forbids discrimination by federal and state governments versus their public staff members. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, however has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law restricts discrimination in a variety of areas, consisting of recruiting, working with, job examinations, promotion policies, employment training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws often extend defense to additional classifications or companies.

Under federal work discrimination law, employers normally can not discriminate versus employees on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] nationwide origin, [1] special needs (physical or psychological, consisting of status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] insolvency or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary info, [10] and citizenship status (for citizens, long-term residents, temporary residents, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964

Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly address work discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to safeguard federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution limit the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property", without due procedure of the law. It also includes an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from violating an individual's rights of due process and equal defense. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their work practices by treating workers, former workers, or job applicants unequally since of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process defense requires that civil servant have a fair procedural process before they are ended if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to totally free speech) or home interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the personal sector is not unconstitutional since Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly offer their respective government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the economic sector. The Federal government's authority to control a personal company, including civil rights laws, stems from their power to regulate all commerce between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically manage some defense from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only resolve inequitable treatment by the federal government, including a public employer.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that manage the private sector are usually Constitutional under the "cops powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws created to safeguard public health, security and morals. All States need to comply with the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil liberties laws that offer extra employment protection.

For example, some State civil liberties laws use protection from employment discrimination on the basis of political association, despite the fact that such forms of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has established with time.

The Equal Pay Act changed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is implemented by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids employers and unions from paying different wages based on sex. It does not forbid other inequitable practices in employing. It provides that where employees carry out equivalent operate in the corner needing "equivalent ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under comparable working conditions," they need to be provided equivalent pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to companies engaged in some aspect of interstate commerce, or all of a company's employees if the business is engaged as a whole in a significant amount of interstate commerce. [citation required]

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in many more elements of the employment relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to the majority of employers participated in interstate commerce with more than 15 workers, labor organizations, and employment service. Title VII prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon protected attributes concerning terms, conditions, and advantages of work. Employment service might not discriminate when employing or referring candidates, and labor organizations are likewise restricted from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, faith, sex, or nationwide origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] An associated statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "forbids discrimination by federal professionals and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and modified in 1978 and 1986, prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost similar to those detailed in Title VII, other than that the ADEA safeguards workers in firms with 20 or more workers instead of 15 or more. An employee is secured from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and restricted compulsory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise offer large pensions). The ADEA consists of specific guidelines for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy versus age discrimination amongst federal specialists". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 forbids work discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal specialists with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs receiving federal monetary help. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs sensible lodging, and Section 508 requires that electronic and details technology be available to handicapped employees. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 prohibits discrimination by mine operators versus miners who experience "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam period veterans by federal professionals". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 forbids employment discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy or bad financial obligations. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 forbids companies with more than 3 staff members from victimizing anybody (except an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to remove discriminatory barriers versus qualified individuals with impairments, people with a record of a special needs, or people who are concerned as having a disability. It restricts discrimination based on real or perceived physical or psychological specials needs. It also requires companies to offer affordable accommodations to workers who need them because of a special needs to request a task, carry out the important functions of a task, or enjoy the advantages and advantages of employment, unless the employer can show that excessive hardship will result. There are stringent limitations on when an employer can ask disability-related questions or need medical checkups, and all medical information needs to be dealt with as personal. A disability is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "considerably restricts several major life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Liberty Acts, changed in 1993, guarantee all persons equal rights under the law and lay out the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars employers from utilizing people' genetic info when making hiring, firing, job positioning, or promotion choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] As of June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly include sexual preference and 29 US states do not clearly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment defenses for LGBT individuals were patchwork; a number of states and regions explicitly prohibit harassment and predisposition in employment choices on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public workers. [22] Prior to the Bostock choice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translated Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's figured out that transgender employees were secured under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the protection to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies show that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, a staggering 90 percent of transgender employees report some kind of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Lots of people in the LGBT community have lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who declares that her boss told her that her existence may make other people feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender people in both public and personal work environments. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in only public workplaces. [27] Some challengers of these laws think that it would invade spiritual liberty, even though these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have also recognized that these laws do not infringe free speech or spiritual liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes also provide extensive defense from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable security as supplied by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide defense to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher protection to workers of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists categories not secured by federal law. Age is consisted of as well, because federal law only covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - admission, individual look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Government employees

Title VII also uses to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state federal governments have extra defenses versus employment discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not affect task efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has translated this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public workers maintain their First Amendment rights, whereas personal companies deserve to limitations staff members' speech in particular methods. [93] Public workers maintain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a personal citizen (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public concern, and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]

Federal staff members who have work discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to take legal action against in the correct federal jurisdiction, which poses a different set of problems for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are usually permitted to consider characteristics that would otherwise be discriminatory if they are bona fide occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this guideline is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court guidelines that police surveillance can match races when needed. For example, if police are running operations that involve confidential informants, or undercover representatives, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can think about race-based policing and employ officers that are proportionate to the community's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for motion pictures and television. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting personnel are allowed to cast characters based on physical attributes, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are rare in the home entertainment market, specifically in entertainers. [95] This justification is special to the entertainment market, and does not transfer to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost reason in wage spaces between different groups of staff members. [96] Cost can be thought about when an employer must stabilize privacy and safety worry about the variety of positions that a company are trying to fill. [96]

Additionally, client preference alone can not be a justification unless there is a personal privacy or safety defense. [96] For circumstances, retail establishments in backwoods can not forbid African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the consumer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that deal with kids survivors of sexual abuse is permitted.

If an employer were trying to show that employment discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be a factual basis for believing that all or employment considerably all members of a class would be unable to perform the job securely and effectively or that it is impractical to identify credentials on a customized basis. [97] Additionally, absence of a malicious motive does not convert a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a prejudiced impact. [97] Employers also bring the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is fairly required, and a lesser inequitable option technique does not exist. [98]

Religious employment discrimination

"Religious discrimination is dealing with people in a different way in their work because of their faith, their faiths and practices, and/or their ask for accommodation (a change in a workplace rule or policy) of their religions and practices. It likewise includes dealing with people in a different way in their work because of their lack of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are forbidden from refusing to employ a specific based on their religion- alike race, sex, age, and impairment. If a staff member thinks that they have experienced spiritual discrimination, they should resolve this to the alleged transgressor. On the other hand, employees are secured by the law for reporting task discrimination and are able to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some locations in the U.S. now have provisions that prohibit discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give particular exemptions in these laws to organizations or institutions that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in different places, depending on the setting and the context; a few of these have actually been maintained and others reversed gradually.

The most current and pervasive example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many employees are using spiritual beliefs versus changing the body and preventative medication as a justification to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not allow workers to look for spiritual exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the worker with employment discrimination on the basis of faiths. However, there are certain requirements for staff members to present proof that it is a regards held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly allows discrimination versus members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has dealt with criticism for prohibiting women from serving in fight roles. In 2016, however, the law was modified to enable them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the article published on the PBS site, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the method in which black guys were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites offered the African Americans a chance to show themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only allowed to work as servants; their involvement was limited to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to safeguard the nation they resided in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the job rights of individuals who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or particular types of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids employers from discriminating against staff members for past or present involvement or subscription in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that give preference to veterans versus non-veterans has actually been declared to impose systemic diverse treatment of women because there is a large underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has actually declined this claim due to the fact that there was no inequitable intent towards ladies in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly victimize a secured classification may still be unlawful if they produce a diverse impact on members of a protected group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts employment practices that have a prejudiced effect, unless they relate to task efficiency.

The Act requires the elimination of artificial, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to exclude Negroes can not be shown to be connected to job performance, it is prohibited, notwithstanding the employer's lack of discriminatory intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been recognized by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on national origin minorities. [108]

When resisting a diverse effect claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not need to demonstrate necessity; rather, it should merely reveal that its practice is reasonable. [citation needed]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interprets and imposes the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are consisted of in area 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file suit under Title VII and/or the ADA need to tire their administrative treatments by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their suit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs imposes Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination versus qualified people with disabilities by federal contractors and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and enforces its own policies that use to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary help. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination arrangements of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based on citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

See likewise

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination versus persons with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage gap in the United States
Gender pay gap in the United States
Criticism of credit history systems in the United States

References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the initial on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits work environment predisposition versus gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, section 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the initial on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful discriminatory practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New york city State Executive Law, employment Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in particular activities. - New York Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work because of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR TAKING PART IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their hiring practices based upon an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, employment 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the initial on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Get ready for more US females in combat". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally posted on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During The Second World War|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the initial on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to protect older workers. Weak to start with, she specifies that the ADEA has been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.